From the analysis of historical monuments, it follows that the flourishing of the Earth's civilization began suddenly, from the moment when the "gods of heaven and Earth" came to Earth.
From the analysis of historical monuments, it follows that the flourishing of the Earth's civilization began suddenly, from the moment when the "gods of heaven and Earth" came to Earth.
It happened a very long time ago, many thousands of years ago, but the memory of that most important event in the history of the Earth sunk deeply. He was remembered by all the developed civilizations of the Earth, whose ancestors left many frank mentions and stories about that bright time when the gods lived next to people and spoke the same language with them.
From that moment, colossal evolutionary prospects opened up before earthlings. Everything in the life of earthlings has changed for the better.
Actually, civilization began with the arrival of the gods, who began to transfer to people knowledge about astronomy, mathematics, medicine, agriculture, construction and much more. In fact, everything that we are rich in today, in both positive and negative senses, began just then.
The era of dawn and grandiose prospects ended as suddenly as it began, only at that last moment, the gods left the Earth fleetingly, leaving no coordinates or parting words - they just left.
The cataclysms that followed the departure of the "gods" erased from memory many episodes of those days, including the place from where the gods came and where they left. Therefore, this exciting part of the history of the Earth had to be restored bit by bit.
It all began in the Valley of the Kings, in the burial chamber of Ramses VI, 20th dynasty of the New Kingdom. Down there, inside, on the upper level J, on the right wall, in its central part is the image of interest to us.
From that moment, colossal evolutionary prospects opened up before earthlings. Everything in the life of earthlings has changed for the better.
Actually, civilization began with the arrival of the gods, who began to transfer to people knowledge about astronomy, mathematics, medicine, agriculture, construction and much more. In fact, everything that we are rich in today, in both positive and negative senses, began just then.
The era of dawn and grandiose prospects ended as suddenly as it began, only at that last moment, the gods left the Earth fleetingly, leaving no coordinates or parting words - they just left.
The cataclysms that followed the departure of the "gods" erased from memory many episodes of those days, including the place from where the gods came and where they left. Therefore, this exciting part of the history of the Earth had to be restored bit by bit.
It all began in the Valley of the Kings, in the burial chamber of Ramses VI, 20th dynasty of the New Kingdom. Down there, inside, on the upper level J, on the right wall, in its central part is the image of interest to us.
A fragment of the Book of the Earth, Part A, Scene 7, from the tomb of Ramses VI in the Valley of the Kings.
It is a fragment from the Book of the Earth, Part A, Scene 7. This image contains several layers of information, but we shall concentrate for the moment on the main thing.
It is a fragment from the Book of the Earth, Part A, Scene 7. This image contains several layers of information, but we shall concentrate for the moment on the main thing.
The figure in the centre of the composition is covered with yellow paint. Semen is dripping from his phallus onto the head of the little human figure.
What associations does that bring to your mind? Egyptologists thought the same.
Everything depicted here explains in brilliantly concrete fashion that:
What associations does that bring to your mind? Egyptologists thought the same.
Everything depicted here explains in brilliantly concrete fashion that:
A fragment of the Book of the Earth, Part A, Scene 7, from the tomb of Ramses VI in the Valley of the Kings.
The figure in the centre is the sun, hence the golden yellow colour of his body.
The phallus and semen allude to the giving of life!
The figure in the centre is the sun, hence the golden yellow colour of his body.
The phallus and semen allude to the giving of life!
Look again – running through the centre of the figure is a curved line – that's an orbit. It passes through the third chakra (the solar plexus), which is a direct indication of the ordinal number of the orbit. TWO planets are shown on this orbit: one in front of the figure, the other behind.
This composition plainly states that on the orbit of the Earth (the third out from the Sun) TWO planets are circling: the Earth and some other body.
This composition plainly states that on the orbit of the Earth (the third out from the Sun) TWO planets are circling: the Earth and some other body.
A fragment of the Book of the Earth, Part A, Scene 7, from the tomb of Ramses VI in the Valley of the Kings.
The Sun looks at the Earth, the size (mass) of which is less than the size of the planet behind the Sun's back. It is located diametrically opposite us, behind the Sun, so we cannot see it!
The Sun looks at the Earth, the size (mass) of which is less than the size of the planet behind the Sun's back. It is located diametrically opposite us, behind the Sun, so we cannot see it!
Evidently the Egyptians were seeking to set down for perpetuity this information received from the Neferu. It therefore survived not only on the walls of tombs in the Valley of the Kings, but also in the cosmogony of the Pythagorean Philolaus, who asserted that in our Solar System there is one more planet, which he called – the Counter-Earth.
Image of the Sun and
two planets on the third orbit.
Burial of Ramses VI
in the Valley of the Kings, Egypt.
two planets on the third orbit.
Burial of Ramses VI
in the Valley of the Kings, Egypt.
Tomb of Tausert and Setnakht (KV 14)
Valley of the Kings, Egypt.
Valley of the Kings, Egypt.
Here are some curious facts recorded by astronomers:
In the early hours of 25 January 1672, Giovanni Domenico Cassini, the director of the Paris Observatory, discovered close to Venus an unknown crescent-shaped body that had a dark side – a direct indication that this was a large planet and not a star. Venus too was crescent-shaped at that time, so at first Cassini assumed that what he had discovered was its satellite. The body was of very large size. Cassini estimated its diameter as a quarter that of Venus.
Fourteen years later, on 18 August 1686, Cassini saw the same body again, an event he recorded in his diary
Giovanni Domenico Cassini
Джованни Доменико Кассини (Giovanni Domenico Cassini)
James Short
On 23 October 1740, shortly before sunrise, the mysterious planet was spotted by James Short, a member of the British Royal Society and an amateur astronomer.
Aiming his telescope at Venus, he saw very close to it a little "starlet". Pointing another telescope at it that had a magnification of 50–60 and was fitted with a micrometer, he determined its distance from Venus, which was around 10.2˚.
Venus could be seen exceptionally clearly. The air was very clear and so Short took a look at this "starlet" at a magnification of 240 and, to his enormous surprise, discovered that it was in the same phase as Venus. That is to say Venus and the mysterious planet were lit by our Sun and the planet had the same kind of crescent-shaped shadow as could be observed on the visible disc of Venus.
The apparent diameter of the planet was roughly a third that of Venus. Its light was not as bright or clear, but had exceptionally sharp, precise edges due to the fact that it lay considerably further from the Sun than Venus. A line passing through the centre of Venus and the planet formed an angle of around 18–20˚ with the equator of Venus.
Short observed the planet for an hour, but, due to the growing daylight, he lost it around 8.15 in the morning.
Aiming his telescope at Venus, he saw very close to it a little "starlet". Pointing another telescope at it that had a magnification of 50–60 and was fitted with a micrometer, he determined its distance from Venus, which was around 10.2˚.
Venus could be seen exceptionally clearly. The air was very clear and so Short took a look at this "starlet" at a magnification of 240 and, to his enormous surprise, discovered that it was in the same phase as Venus. That is to say Venus and the mysterious planet were lit by our Sun and the planet had the same kind of crescent-shaped shadow as could be observed on the visible disc of Venus.
The apparent diameter of the planet was roughly a third that of Venus. Its light was not as bright or clear, but had exceptionally sharp, precise edges due to the fact that it lay considerably further from the Sun than Venus. A line passing through the centre of Venus and the planet formed an angle of around 18–20˚ with the equator of Venus.
Short observed the planet for an hour, but, due to the growing daylight, he lost it around 8.15 in the morning.
23 октября 1740 года, Джеймс Шорт (James Short).
The next observation was made on 20 May 1759, by the astronomer Andreas Mayer in Greifswald, Germany.
Andreas Mayer
Андреас Майер
(Andreas Mayer)
(Германия).
The exceptional "glitch" in the functioning of the solar "dynamo" that took place in the late seventeenth and early to mid-eighteenth centuries (which also manifested itself in the Maunder minimum, when there were hardly any sunspots for fifty years) caused the orbital instability of the Counter-Earth.
The exceptional "glitch" in the functioning of the solar "dynamo" that took place in the late seventeenth and early to mid-eighteenth centuries (which also manifested itself in the Maunder minimum, when there were hardly any sunspots for fifty years) caused the orbital instability of the Counter-Earth.
1761 was the year in which most of its observations were made.
For several consecutive days: February 10,11 and 12 reported of observations the planet (a satellite of Venus) came from Joseph Louis Lagrange from Marseilles, future director of the Berlin Academy of Sciences.
Joseph Louis Lagrange
On 3,4, 7 and 11 March the planet was seen by Jacques Montaigne, a member of the Limoges community.
That same month, on 15, 28 and 29 March, Monbarreaux of Auxerre in France also saw in his telescope a celestial body that he considered a "satellite of Venus".
Eight sightings of this body were made in June, July and August by Redner of Copenhagen.
That same month, on 15, 28 and 29 March, Monbarreaux of Auxerre in France also saw in his telescope a celestial body that he considered a "satellite of Venus".
Eight sightings of this body were made in June, July and August by Redner of Copenhagen.
In 1764 the mysterious planet was seen by Roedkier.
On 3 January 1768, it was observed by Christian Horrebow of Copenhagen.
The latest observation was made on 13 August 1892. The American astronomer Edward Emerson Barnard spotted close to Venus (where there were no stars with which the sighting might have been associated) an unknown object of the seventh stellar magnitude. Then the planet went back behind the Sun.
The various estimates of the size of the body observed ranged between a quarter and a third of the size of Venus.
Perplexed readers may object, citing the achievements of modern astronomy and the probes already travelling the farther reaches of the Solar System, so let us clarify it all right away.
A very important point that non-specialists are generally unaware of is that probes flying through space do not "look out to the sides". In order to constantly maintain and correct their courses, the "electronic eyes" of space vehicles are directed towards specific celestial bodies used as landmarks, such as the bright star Canopus.
The distance from Earth to the Counter-Earth is so great that, bearing in mind the size of the Sun and the effects it produces, a fairly large celestial body can be lost in the space behind the Sun, remaining invisible for long periods of time. Take a look at the illustration to get the picture.
On 3 January 1768, it was observed by Christian Horrebow of Copenhagen.
The latest observation was made on 13 August 1892. The American astronomer Edward Emerson Barnard spotted close to Venus (where there were no stars with which the sighting might have been associated) an unknown object of the seventh stellar magnitude. Then the planet went back behind the Sun.
The various estimates of the size of the body observed ranged between a quarter and a third of the size of Venus.
Perplexed readers may object, citing the achievements of modern astronomy and the probes already travelling the farther reaches of the Solar System, so let us clarify it all right away.
A very important point that non-specialists are generally unaware of is that probes flying through space do not "look out to the sides". In order to constantly maintain and correct their courses, the "electronic eyes" of space vehicles are directed towards specific celestial bodies used as landmarks, such as the bright star Canopus.
The distance from Earth to the Counter-Earth is so great that, bearing in mind the size of the Sun and the effects it produces, a fairly large celestial body can be lost in the space behind the Sun, remaining invisible for long periods of time. Take a look at the illustration to get the picture.
The average distance from the Earth to the Sun is 149,600,000 kilometres, and the distance from the Sun to the Counter-Earth is the same, since it is on the Earth's orbit behind the Sun.
The diameter of the Sun is 1,390,600 km or 109 diameters of the Earth (equatorial diameter 12,756 km).
If we add up the distance from the Earth to the Sun and the Sun to the Counter-Earth, taking into account the diameter of the Sun, we get a total distance from Earth to Counter-Earth of 300,590,600 km.
Dividing this distance by the diameter of the Earth, we get 23,564.75.
If we add up the distance from the Earth to the Sun and the Sun to the Counter-Earth, taking into account the diameter of the Sun, we get a total distance from Earth to Counter-Earth of 300,590,600 km.
Dividing this distance by the diameter of the Earth, we get 23,564.75.
Now let's picture the situation in miniature, taking the Earth to be an object one metre in diameter (i.e. a scale of 1:12,756,000) and see how the Counter-Earth will look in a photograph in comparison to this object.
Let's take another 1-metre sphere. If we place the first sphere (Earth) straight in front of the camera lens, we will need to put the other one 23 km 564.75 metres away according to our calculations.
Obviously at that distance the second sphere (Counter-Earth) will be so small in the picture as to be simply invisible.
Irrespective of the definition of the camera and the size of the frame, it will be impossible to see both globes on photo simultaneously, especially if halfway between them there is a powerful light source imitating the Sun with a diameter of 109 metres!
Therefore, considering the distance, relative sizes and brightness of the Sun, as well as the fact that the eyes of science are directed elsewhere, it is not surprising that the Counter-Earth still remains unnoticed.
The invisible area behind the Sun, taking its corona into account, is equal to ten times the lunar orbit, or 600 times the diameter of the Earth. Hence there is more than enough room for the mysterious planet to hide in.
Astronauts flying to the Moon would not be able to see the planet. To do that they would have to travel 10–15 times farther.
Obviously at that distance the second sphere (Counter-Earth) will be so small in the picture as to be simply invisible.
Irrespective of the definition of the camera and the size of the frame, it will be impossible to see both globes on photo simultaneously, especially if halfway between them there is a powerful light source imitating the Sun with a diameter of 109 metres!
Therefore, considering the distance, relative sizes and brightness of the Sun, as well as the fact that the eyes of science are directed elsewhere, it is not surprising that the Counter-Earth still remains unnoticed.
The invisible area behind the Sun, taking its corona into account, is equal to ten times the lunar orbit, or 600 times the diameter of the Earth. Hence there is more than enough room for the mysterious planet to hide in.
Astronauts flying to the Moon would not be able to see the planet. To do that they would have to travel 10–15 times farther.
The Earth – Sun – Counter-Earth system.
The invisible area behind the Sun, taking its corona into account, is equal to ten times the lunar orbit, or 600 times the diameter of the Earth.
The invisible area behind the Sun, taking its corona into account, is equal to ten times the lunar orbit, or 600 times the diameter of the Earth.
In order to become convinced once and for all that we are not alone in the universe and that our "brothers by mind" are very close by, but not where the astronomers are searching, we need to photograph the appropriate section of the Earth's orbit.
In order to become convinced once and for all that we are not alone in the universe and that our "brothers by mind" are very close by, but not where the astronomers are searching, we need to photograph the appropriate section of the Earth's orbit.
The space telescope SOHO that constantly photographs the Sun is close to the Earth and so cannot in principle see the planet behind the Sun, unless it shifts its position once again as it did in the late 1700s and beginning 1800s due to powerful solar magnetic storms.
The location of the SOHO telescope in respect of the Sun and Counter-Earth.
The situation could be clarified by a series of pictures taken from probes in orbit around Mars, but the angle of view and magnification should be appropriate, otherwise the discovery will be postponed once more.
The situation could be clarified by a series of pictures taken from probes in orbit around Mars, but the angle of view and magnification should be appropriate, otherwise the discovery will be postponed once more.
The secret of the Counter-Earth is kept from us not only by the vastness of outer space and the blindness and indifference of science to what historical records tell us, but also by someone's invisible hand.
In this context, it might be suggested that the disappearance of the Soviet space probe Phobos 1 was in all probability due to it becoming an "untimely witness".
The probe was launched from the Baikonur space centre on 7 July 1988 and, having entered its planned orbit, it began to take photographs of the Sun in accordance with its program. 140 x-ray images of the Sun were relayed back to Earth and if Phobos 1 had continued photographing, then it would have taken a shot leading to an historic discovery. But in 1988 that discovery was not supposed to happen, so the world's news agencies reported that contact with Phobos 1 had been lost.
The fate of Phobos 2, launched on 12 July 1988, was similar, although it managed to reach the environs of Mars – probably because it did not take pictures of the Sun. However, on 28 March 1989, though, as it approached the Martian moon Phobos, contact with the probe was lost.
The last picture sent back to Earth showed a huge cigar-shaped object that evidently deflected Phobos 2.
In this context, it might be suggested that the disappearance of the Soviet space probe Phobos 1 was in all probability due to it becoming an "untimely witness".
The probe was launched from the Baikonur space centre on 7 July 1988 and, having entered its planned orbit, it began to take photographs of the Sun in accordance with its program. 140 x-ray images of the Sun were relayed back to Earth and if Phobos 1 had continued photographing, then it would have taken a shot leading to an historic discovery. But in 1988 that discovery was not supposed to happen, so the world's news agencies reported that contact with Phobos 1 had been lost.
The fate of Phobos 2, launched on 12 July 1988, was similar, although it managed to reach the environs of Mars – probably because it did not take pictures of the Sun. However, on 28 March 1989, though, as it approached the Martian moon Phobos, contact with the probe was lost.
The last picture sent back to Earth showed a huge cigar-shaped object that evidently deflected Phobos 2.
The planet Mars and its satellite Phobos.
Below right is the photo of the cigar-shaped object next to Phobos that was taken by the Phobos 2 probe.
The moon measures 28х20х18 km, from which you can gauge the immense size of the object photographed.
Below right is the photo of the cigar-shaped object next to Phobos that was taken by the Phobos 2 probe.
The moon measures 28х20х18 km, from which you can gauge the immense size of the object photographed.
Judge for yourself. Here is what the astrophysicist Kirill Butusov has to say:
Kirill Butusov
«The presence of a planet behind the Sun and the rational behaviour of certain forces associated with it is indicated by unusual comets about which a fair amount of information has accumulated. These comets sometimes go behind the Sun, but don't come out again, as if they were space ships.
Or another very interesting example – the 1956 Comet Arend-Roland, which was perceived in the radio frequency range. Its radiation was picked up by radio-astronomers.
When Comet Arend-Roland appeared from behind the Sun there was a transmitter in its tail working on a wavelength of around 30 meters. Then the transmitter in the tail began working on a half-meter wavelength, separated from the comet and went off back behind the Sun.
One more quite incredible fact are the comets that made sort of inspection flights passing the planets of the Solar System in turn."».
Or another very interesting example – the 1956 Comet Arend-Roland, which was perceived in the radio frequency range. Its radiation was picked up by radio-astronomers.
When Comet Arend-Roland appeared from behind the Sun there was a transmitter in its tail working on a wavelength of around 30 meters. Then the transmitter in the tail began working on a half-meter wavelength, separated from the comet and went off back behind the Sun.
One more quite incredible fact are the comets that made sort of inspection flights passing the planets of the Solar System in turn."».
This is more than curious; but let us not get distracted and return to the past.
The crescent body showing from behind the Sun is the twelfth planet that was lacking for an harmonious and stable picture of the structure of the Solar System that would accord, especially, with ancient texts.
This is more than curious; but let us not get distracted and return to the past.
The crescent body showing from behind the Sun is the twelfth planet that was lacking for an harmonious and stable picture of the structure of the Solar System that would accord, especially, with ancient texts.
The Sumerians, incidentally, claimed that it was from the twelfth planet of the Solar System that "the Gods of Sky and Earth" descended to Earth.
It should be stressed that the location of this planet on our orbit behind the Sun places it in the sphere favourable to life, in contrast to the planet Marduk (Nibiru according to Sitchin), whose orbital period of 3,600 years and orbit going way beyond the "belt of life" and the limits of the Solar System make the existence of life there impossible.
Such a turn of events is admittedly rather puzzling – but then gradually everything begins to fit into place.
Mars was the very planet from which the "gods of heaven and earth" came to Earth. But after a great catastrophe, the gods were forced to leave for the planet behind the Sun.
Therefore the first conclusion from what has been stated that we shall set in a prominent place is that the "Source" of the ancients' knowledge would seem to have been extraterrestrial in origin!
This forces us to radically reassess our attitude to the surviving works of antiquity as they probably contain priceless information about the world around us, humanity, the true history of Earth and our astonishing ancestors.
If certain readers have the impression that this is some fantasy novel and are still in doubt about the very possibility of our remote ancestors having profound scientific understanding, let us make a brief digression in order to convince ourselves that the ideas of the ancients were, at least at source, highly scientific.
Let us return to the image from the tomb of Ramses VI, containing a fragment of the Book of the Earth.
For justice' sake it should be stressed that that the title of this fragment as translated by classical Egyptologists is "He who hides the clock, a personification of the water clock" or "A phallic figure in a water clock"!?
It should be stressed that the location of this planet on our orbit behind the Sun places it in the sphere favourable to life, in contrast to the planet Marduk (Nibiru according to Sitchin), whose orbital period of 3,600 years and orbit going way beyond the "belt of life" and the limits of the Solar System make the existence of life there impossible.
Such a turn of events is admittedly rather puzzling – but then gradually everything begins to fit into place.
Mars was the very planet from which the "gods of heaven and earth" came to Earth. But after a great catastrophe, the gods were forced to leave for the planet behind the Sun.
Therefore the first conclusion from what has been stated that we shall set in a prominent place is that the "Source" of the ancients' knowledge would seem to have been extraterrestrial in origin!
This forces us to radically reassess our attitude to the surviving works of antiquity as they probably contain priceless information about the world around us, humanity, the true history of Earth and our astonishing ancestors.
If certain readers have the impression that this is some fantasy novel and are still in doubt about the very possibility of our remote ancestors having profound scientific understanding, let us make a brief digression in order to convince ourselves that the ideas of the ancients were, at least at source, highly scientific.
Let us return to the image from the tomb of Ramses VI, containing a fragment of the Book of the Earth.
For justice' sake it should be stressed that that the title of this fragment as translated by classical Egyptologists is "He who hides the clock, a personification of the water clock" or "A phallic figure in a water clock"!?
How do you like that?
Such an awkward interpretation is the result of an incredible pattern of thinking and an incorrect translation of the meaning of the hieroglyphics.
Given the recent surge in solar activity, it is quite conceivable that Marduk will re-enter our field of vision in the foreseeable future, marking a turning point and the beginning of a renewed contact between two neighbouring civilisations with a distant, partially shared past.
Valery Uvarov
Such an awkward interpretation is the result of an incredible pattern of thinking and an incorrect translation of the meaning of the hieroglyphics.
Given the recent surge in solar activity, it is quite conceivable that Marduk will re-enter our field of vision in the foreseeable future, marking a turning point and the beginning of a renewed contact between two neighbouring civilisations with a distant, partially shared past.
Valery Uvarov
From the analysis of historical monuments, it follows that the flourishing of the Earth's civilization began suddenly, from the moment when the "gods of heaven and Earth" came to Earth.
It happened a very long time ago, many thousands of years ago, but the memory of that most important event in the history of the Earth sunk deeply. He was remembered by all the developed civilizations of the Earth, whose ancestors left many frank mentions and stories about that bright time when the gods lived next to people and spoke the same language with them.
From that moment, colossal evolutionary prospects opened up before earthlings. Everything in the life of earthlings has changed for the better. Actually, civilization began with the arrival of the gods, who began to transfer to people knowledge about astronomy, mathematics, medicine, agriculture, construction and much more. In fact, everything that we are rich in today, both in positive and negative senses, began just then.
The era of dawn and grandiose prospects ended as suddenly as it began, only at that last moment, the gods left the Earth fleetingly, leaving no coordinates or parting words - they just left.
The cataclysms that followed the departure of the "gods" erased from memory many episodes of those days, including the place from where the gods came and where they left. Therefore, this exciting part of the history of the Earth had to be restored bit by bit.
It all began in the Valley of the Kings, in the burial place of Ramses VI, 20th dynasty of the New Kingdom. Down there, inside, on the upper level J, on the right wall, in its central part is the image of interest to us.
It happened a very long time ago, many thousands of years ago, but the memory of that most important event in the history of the Earth sunk deeply. He was remembered by all the developed civilizations of the Earth, whose ancestors left many frank mentions and stories about that bright time when the gods lived next to people and spoke the same language with them.
From that moment, colossal evolutionary prospects opened up before earthlings. Everything in the life of earthlings has changed for the better. Actually, civilization began with the arrival of the gods, who began to transfer to people knowledge about astronomy, mathematics, medicine, agriculture, construction and much more. In fact, everything that we are rich in today, both in positive and negative senses, began just then.
The era of dawn and grandiose prospects ended as suddenly as it began, only at that last moment, the gods left the Earth fleetingly, leaving no coordinates or parting words - they just left.
The cataclysms that followed the departure of the "gods" erased from memory many episodes of those days, including the place from where the gods came and where they left. Therefore, this exciting part of the history of the Earth had to be restored bit by bit.
It all began in the Valley of the Kings, in the burial place of Ramses VI, 20th dynasty of the New Kingdom. Down there, inside, on the upper level J, on the right wall, in its central part is the image of interest to us.
A fragment of the Book of the Earth, Part A, Scene 7, from the tomb of Ramses VI in the Valley of the Kings
It is a fragment from the Book of the Earth, Part A, Scene 7. This image contains several layers of information, but we shall concentrate for the moment on the main thing.
The figure in the centre of the composition is covered with yellow paint. Semen is dripping from his phallus onto the head of the little human figure. What associations does that bring to your mind? Egyptologists thought the same.
Everything depicted here explains in brilliantly concrete fashion that:
The figure in the centre is the sun, hence the golden yellow colour of his body. The phallus and semen allude to the giving of life! Look again – running through the centre of the figure is a curved line – that's an orbit. It passes through the third chakra (the solar plexus), which is a direct indication of the ordinal number of the orbit. TWO planets are shown on this orbit: one in front of the figure, the other behind.
This composition plainly states that on the orbit of the Earth (the third out from the Sun) TWO planets are circling: the Earth and some other body. The Sun looks at the Earth, the size (mass) of which is less than the size of the planet behind the Sun's back. It is located diametrically opposite us, behind the Sun, so we cannot see it! Evidently the Egyptians were seeking to set down for perpetuity this information received from the Neferu. It therefore survived not only on the walls of tombs in the Valley of the Kings, but also in the cosmogony of the Pythagorean Philolaus, who asserted that in our Solar System there is one more planet, which he called – the Counter-Earth.
The figure in the centre of the composition is covered with yellow paint. Semen is dripping from his phallus onto the head of the little human figure. What associations does that bring to your mind? Egyptologists thought the same.
Everything depicted here explains in brilliantly concrete fashion that:
The figure in the centre is the sun, hence the golden yellow colour of his body. The phallus and semen allude to the giving of life! Look again – running through the centre of the figure is a curved line – that's an orbit. It passes through the third chakra (the solar plexus), which is a direct indication of the ordinal number of the orbit. TWO planets are shown on this orbit: one in front of the figure, the other behind.
This composition plainly states that on the orbit of the Earth (the third out from the Sun) TWO planets are circling: the Earth and some other body. The Sun looks at the Earth, the size (mass) of which is less than the size of the planet behind the Sun's back. It is located diametrically opposite us, behind the Sun, so we cannot see it! Evidently the Egyptians were seeking to set down for perpetuity this information received from the Neferu. It therefore survived not only on the walls of tombs in the Valley of the Kings, but also in the cosmogony of the Pythagorean Philolaus, who asserted that in our Solar System there is one more planet, which he called – the Counter-Earth.
Image of the Sun and two planets on the third orbit. Burial of Ramses VI in the Valley of the Kings, Egypt.
Here are some curious facts recorded by astronomers:
In the early hours of 25 January 1672, Giovanni Domenico Cassini, the director of the Paris Observatory, discovered close to Venus an unknown crescent-shaped body that had a dark side – a direct indication that this was a large planet and not a star. Venus too was crescent-shaped at that time, so at first Cassini assumed that what he had discovered was its satellite. The body was of very large size. Cassini estimated its diameter as a quarter that of Venus.
Giovanni Domenico Cassini
Fourteen years later, on 18 August 1686, Cassini saw the same body again, an event he recorded in his diary.
On 23 October 1740, shortly before sunrise, the mysterious planet was spotted by James Short, a member of the British Royal Society and an amateur astronomer.
On 23 October 1740, shortly before sunrise, the mysterious planet was spotted by James Short, a member of the British Royal Society and an amateur astronomer.
James Short
Aiming his telescope at Venus, he saw very close to it a little "starlet". Pointing another telescope at it that had a magnification of 50–60 and was fitted with a micrometer, he determined its distance from Venus, which was around 10.2˚.
Venus could be seen exceptionally clearly.
The air was very clear and so Short took a look at this "starlet" at a magnification of 240 and, to his enormous surprise, discovered that it was in the same phase as Venus. That is to say Venus and the mysterious planet were lit by our Sun and the planet had the same kind of crescent-shaped shadow as could be observed on the visible disc of Venus.
The apparent diameter of the planet was roughly a third that of Venus.
Its light was not as bright or clear, but had exceptionally sharp, precise edges due to the fact that it lay considerably further from the Sun than Venus.
A line passing through the centre of Venus and the planet formed an angle of around 18–20˚ with the equator of Venus.
Short observed the planet for an hour, but, due to the growing daylight, he lost it around 8.15 in the morning.
Venus could be seen exceptionally clearly.
The air was very clear and so Short took a look at this "starlet" at a magnification of 240 and, to his enormous surprise, discovered that it was in the same phase as Venus. That is to say Venus and the mysterious planet were lit by our Sun and the planet had the same kind of crescent-shaped shadow as could be observed on the visible disc of Venus.
The apparent diameter of the planet was roughly a third that of Venus.
Its light was not as bright or clear, but had exceptionally sharp, precise edges due to the fact that it lay considerably further from the Sun than Venus.
A line passing through the centre of Venus and the planet formed an angle of around 18–20˚ with the equator of Venus.
Short observed the planet for an hour, but, due to the growing daylight, he lost it around 8.15 in the morning.
The next observation was made on 20 May 1759, by the astronomer Andreas Mayer in Greifswald, Germany.
Andreas Mayer
The exceptional "glitch" in the functioning of the solar "dynamo" that took place in the late seventeenth and early to mid-eighteenth centuries (which also manifested itself in the Maunder minimum, when there were hardly any sunspots for fifty years) caused the orbital instability of the Counter-Earth.
The Maunder Minimum in the 400-year historical records of sunspot activity
1761 was the year in which most of its observations were made. For several consecutive days: February 10,11 and 12 reported of observations the planet (a satellite of Venus) came from Joseph Louis Lagrange from Marseilles, future director of the Berlin Academy of Sciences.
Joseph Louis Lagrange
On 3,4, 7 and 11 March the planet was seen by Jacques Montaigne, a member of the Limoges community.
That same month, on 15, 28 and 29 March, Monbarreaux of Auxerre in France also saw in his telescope a celestial body that he considered a "satellite of Venus". Eight sightings of this body were made in June, July and August by Redner of Copenhagen.
In 1764 the mysterious planet was seen by Roedkier. On 3 January 1768, it was observed by Christian Horrebow of Copenhagen. The latest observation was made on 13 August 1892. The American astronomer Edward Emerson Barnard spotted close to Venus (where there were no stars with which the sighting might have been associated) an unknown object of the seventh stellar magnitude. Then the planet went back behind the Sun. The various estimates of the size of the body observed ranged between a quarter and a third of the size of Venus.
Perplexed readers may object, citing the achievements of modern astronomy and the probes already travelling the farther reaches of the Solar System, so let us clarify it all right away.
A very important point that non-specialists are generally unaware of is that probes flying through space do not "look out to the sides". In order to constantly maintain and correct their courses, the "electronic eyes" of space vehicles are directed towards specific celestial bodies used as landmarks, such as the bright star Canopus.
The distance from Earth to the Counter-Earth is so great that, bearing in mind the size of the Sun and the effects it produces, a fairly large celestial body can be lost in the space behind the Sun, remaining invisible for long periods of time. Take a look at the illustration to get the picture.
That same month, on 15, 28 and 29 March, Monbarreaux of Auxerre in France also saw in his telescope a celestial body that he considered a "satellite of Venus". Eight sightings of this body were made in June, July and August by Redner of Copenhagen.
In 1764 the mysterious planet was seen by Roedkier. On 3 January 1768, it was observed by Christian Horrebow of Copenhagen. The latest observation was made on 13 August 1892. The American astronomer Edward Emerson Barnard spotted close to Venus (where there were no stars with which the sighting might have been associated) an unknown object of the seventh stellar magnitude. Then the planet went back behind the Sun. The various estimates of the size of the body observed ranged between a quarter and a third of the size of Venus.
Perplexed readers may object, citing the achievements of modern astronomy and the probes already travelling the farther reaches of the Solar System, so let us clarify it all right away.
A very important point that non-specialists are generally unaware of is that probes flying through space do not "look out to the sides". In order to constantly maintain and correct their courses, the "electronic eyes" of space vehicles are directed towards specific celestial bodies used as landmarks, such as the bright star Canopus.
The distance from Earth to the Counter-Earth is so great that, bearing in mind the size of the Sun and the effects it produces, a fairly large celestial body can be lost in the space behind the Sun, remaining invisible for long periods of time. Take a look at the illustration to get the picture.
The Earth – Sun – Counter-Earth system.
The invisible area behind the Sun, taking its corona into account, is equal to ten times the lunar orbit, or 600 times the diameter of the Earth.
The invisible area behind the Sun, taking its corona into account, is equal to ten times the lunar orbit, or 600 times the diameter of the Earth.
The average distance from the Earth to the Sun is 149,600,000 kilometres, and the distance from the Sun to the Counter-Earth is the same, since it is on the Earth's orbit behind the Sun. The diameter of the Sun is 1,390,600 km or 109 diameters of the Earth (equatorial diameter 12,756 km). If we add up the distance from the Earth to the Sun and the Sun to the Counter-Earth, taking into account the diameter of the Sun, we get a total distance from Earth to Counter-Earth of 300,590,600 km. Dividing this distance by the diameter of the Earth, we get 23,564.75.
Now let's picture the situation in miniature, taking the Earth to be an object one metre in diameter (i.e. a scale of 1:12,756,000) and see how the Counter-Earth will look in a photograph in comparison to this object. Let's take another 1-metre sphere. If we place the first sphere (Earth) straight in front of the camera lens, we will need to put the other one 23 km 564.75 metres away according to our calculations. Obviously at that distance the second sphere (Counter-Earth) will be so small in the picture as to be simply invisible. Irrespective of the definition of the camera and the size of the frame, it will be impossible to see both globes on photo simultaneously, especially if halfway between them there is a powerful light source imitating the Sun with a diameter of 109 metres! Therefore, considering the distance, relative sizes and brightness of the Sun, as well as the fact that the eyes of science are directed elsewhere, it is not surprising that the Counter-Earth still remains unnoticed.
The invisible area behind the Sun, taking its corona into account, is equal to ten times the lunar orbit, or 600 times the diameter of the Earth. Hence there is more than enough room for the mysterious planet to hide in. Astronauts flying to the Moon would not be able to see the planet. To do that they would have to travel 10–15 times farther.
In order to become convinced once and for all that we are not alone in the universe and that our "brothers by mind" are very close by, but not where the astronomers are searching, we need to photograph the appropriate section of the Earth's orbit. The space telescope SOHO that constantly photographs the Sun is close to the Earth and so cannot in principle see the planet behind the Sun, unless it shifts its position once again as it did in the late 1700s and beginning 1800s due to powerful solar magnetic storms.
Now let's picture the situation in miniature, taking the Earth to be an object one metre in diameter (i.e. a scale of 1:12,756,000) and see how the Counter-Earth will look in a photograph in comparison to this object. Let's take another 1-metre sphere. If we place the first sphere (Earth) straight in front of the camera lens, we will need to put the other one 23 km 564.75 metres away according to our calculations. Obviously at that distance the second sphere (Counter-Earth) will be so small in the picture as to be simply invisible. Irrespective of the definition of the camera and the size of the frame, it will be impossible to see both globes on photo simultaneously, especially if halfway between them there is a powerful light source imitating the Sun with a diameter of 109 metres! Therefore, considering the distance, relative sizes and brightness of the Sun, as well as the fact that the eyes of science are directed elsewhere, it is not surprising that the Counter-Earth still remains unnoticed.
The invisible area behind the Sun, taking its corona into account, is equal to ten times the lunar orbit, or 600 times the diameter of the Earth. Hence there is more than enough room for the mysterious planet to hide in. Astronauts flying to the Moon would not be able to see the planet. To do that they would have to travel 10–15 times farther.
In order to become convinced once and for all that we are not alone in the universe and that our "brothers by mind" are very close by, but not where the astronomers are searching, we need to photograph the appropriate section of the Earth's orbit. The space telescope SOHO that constantly photographs the Sun is close to the Earth and so cannot in principle see the planet behind the Sun, unless it shifts its position once again as it did in the late 1700s and beginning 1800s due to powerful solar magnetic storms.
The location of the SOHO telescope in respect of the Sun and Counter-Earth.
The planet Mars and its satellite Phobos.
Below right is the photo of the cigar-shaped object next to Phobos that was taken by the Phobos 2 probe.
The moon measures 28х20х18 km, from which you can gauge the immense size of the object photographed.
Below right is the photo of the cigar-shaped object next to Phobos that was taken by the Phobos 2 probe.
The moon measures 28х20х18 km, from which you can gauge the immense size of the object photographed.
The fate of Phobos 2, launched on 12 July 1988, was similar, although it managed to reach the environs of Mars – probably because it did not take pictures of the Sun. On 28 March 1989, though, as it approached the Martian moon Phobos, contact with the probe was lost. The last picture sent back to Earth showed a huge cigar-shaped object that evidently deflected Phobos 2 . These are far from all the "strange things" that go on in our Solar System, for which official science prefers to keep silent. Judge for yourself. Here is what the astrophysicist Kirill Butusov has to say:
Kirill Butusov
"The presence of a planet behind the Sun and the rational behaviour of certain forces associated with it is indicated by unusual comets about which a fair amount of information has accumulated. These comets sometimes go behind the Sun, but don't come out again, as if they were space ships.
Or another very interesting example – the 1956 Comet Arend-Roland, which was perceived in the radio frequency range. Its radiation was picked up by radio-astronomers. When Comet Arend-Roland appeared from behind the Sun there was a transmitter in its tail working on a wavelength of around 30 meters.
Then the transmitter in the tail began working on a half-meter wavelength, separated from the comet and went off back behind the Sun. One more quite incredible fact are the comets that made sort of inspection flights passing the planets of the Solar System in turn."
Or another very interesting example – the 1956 Comet Arend-Roland, which was perceived in the radio frequency range. Its radiation was picked up by radio-astronomers. When Comet Arend-Roland appeared from behind the Sun there was a transmitter in its tail working on a wavelength of around 30 meters.
Then the transmitter in the tail began working on a half-meter wavelength, separated from the comet and went off back behind the Sun. One more quite incredible fact are the comets that made sort of inspection flights passing the planets of the Solar System in turn."
This is more than curious; but let us not get distracted and return to the past.
The crescent body showing from behind the Sun is the twelfth planet that was lacking for an harmonious and stable picture of the structure of the Solar System that would accord, especially, with ancient texts.
The Sumerians, incidentally, claimed that it was from the twelfth planet of the Solar System that "the Gods of Sky and Earth" descended to Earth.
It should be stressed that the location of this planet on our orbit behind the Sun places it in the sphere favourable to life, in contrast to the planet Marduk (according to Sitchin), whose orbital period of 3,600 years and orbit going way beyond the "belt of life" and the limits of the Solar System make the existence of life there impossible.
Such a turn of events is admittedly rather puzzling – but then gradually everything begins to fit into place.
Mars was the very planet from which the "Gods of Heaven and Earth" came to Earth. But after a great catastrophe, the gods were forced to leave for the planet behind the Sun.
Therefore the first conclusion from what has been stated that we shall set in a prominent place is that the "Source" of the ancients' knowledge would seem to have been extraterrestrial in origin!
This forces us to radically reassess our attitude to the surviving works of antiquity as they probably contain priceless information about the world around us, humanity, the true history of Earth and our astonishing ancestors.
If certain readers have the impression that this is some fantasy novel and are still in doubt about the very possibility of our remote ancestors having profound scientific understanding, let us make a brief digression in order to convince ourselves that the ideas of the ancients were, at least at source, highly scientific.
Let us return to the image from the tomb of Ramses VI, containing a fragment of the Book of the Earth.
For justice' sake it should be stressed that that the title of this fragment as translated by classical Egyptologists is "He who hides the clock, a personification of the water clock" or "A phallic figure in a water clock"!?
The crescent body showing from behind the Sun is the twelfth planet that was lacking for an harmonious and stable picture of the structure of the Solar System that would accord, especially, with ancient texts.
The Sumerians, incidentally, claimed that it was from the twelfth planet of the Solar System that "the Gods of Sky and Earth" descended to Earth.
It should be stressed that the location of this planet on our orbit behind the Sun places it in the sphere favourable to life, in contrast to the planet Marduk (according to Sitchin), whose orbital period of 3,600 years and orbit going way beyond the "belt of life" and the limits of the Solar System make the existence of life there impossible.
Such a turn of events is admittedly rather puzzling – but then gradually everything begins to fit into place.
Mars was the very planet from which the "Gods of Heaven and Earth" came to Earth. But after a great catastrophe, the gods were forced to leave for the planet behind the Sun.
Therefore the first conclusion from what has been stated that we shall set in a prominent place is that the "Source" of the ancients' knowledge would seem to have been extraterrestrial in origin!
This forces us to radically reassess our attitude to the surviving works of antiquity as they probably contain priceless information about the world around us, humanity, the true history of Earth and our astonishing ancestors.
If certain readers have the impression that this is some fantasy novel and are still in doubt about the very possibility of our remote ancestors having profound scientific understanding, let us make a brief digression in order to convince ourselves that the ideas of the ancients were, at least at source, highly scientific.
Let us return to the image from the tomb of Ramses VI, containing a fragment of the Book of the Earth.
For justice' sake it should be stressed that that the title of this fragment as translated by classical Egyptologists is "He who hides the clock, a personification of the water clock" or "A phallic figure in a water clock"!?
How do you like that?
Such an awkward interpretation is the result of an incredible pattern of thinking and an incorrect translation of the hieroglyphics.
Given the recent surge in solar activity, it is quite conceivable that Marduk will re-enter our field of vision in the foreseeable future, marking a turning point and the beginning of a renewed contact between two neighbouring civilisations with a distant, partially shared past.
Valery Uvarov
Such an awkward interpretation is the result of an incredible pattern of thinking and an incorrect translation of the hieroglyphics.
Given the recent surge in solar activity, it is quite conceivable that Marduk will re-enter our field of vision in the foreseeable future, marking a turning point and the beginning of a renewed contact between two neighbouring civilisations with a distant, partially shared past.
Valery Uvarov
Contact us
If you have any questions do not hesitate to ask, filling in the form below.
+7 901 301 81 07
+7 964 333 29 36
+7 964 333 29 36
St.Petersburg, Moscowsky pr. 78-2
All rights to the content of this site belong to
Valery M. Uvarov
The use of this content or part of the content from this site in any way
other than personal acquaintance is possible only with the written
permission of Valery M. Uvarov
Valery M. Uvarov
The use of this content or part of the content from this site in any way
other than personal acquaintance is possible only with the written
permission of Valery M. Uvarov
All rights reserved
© 2017 All content on this site is protected by copyright